Who Should Define Intelligent Design, ID Theorists or Their Critics?

Episode 17 July 25, 2006 00:08:59
Who Should Define Intelligent Design, ID Theorists or Their Critics?
Intelligent Design the Future
Who Should Define Intelligent Design, ID Theorists or Their Critics?

Jul 25 2006 | 00:08:59

/

Show Notes

It is common that critics of intelligent design misrepresent the nature of intelligent design in order to make it sound unscientific, unconstitutional, and unpalatable to scientists and the public. In the Kitzmiller vs Dover court case last year, Judge Jones even adopted the critics’ false version of intelligent design rather than letting the proponents of ID stake out their own theory, and speak for themselves. This podcast looks at two recent misrepresentations in the media made by ID-critics involved on the legal side of this debate.

Other Episodes

Episode 0

June 04, 2012 00:17:23
Episode Cover

Interview with National Academy of Sciences Member Philip Skell, Part One

Editor's Note: Dr. Philip Skell sadly passed away on November 21, 2010 at the age of 91. Casey Luskin wrote an obituary in his...

Listen

Episode 1969

October 18, 2024 00:19:24
Episode Cover

Paul Nelson on Listening to Nature for Her Answers

On this ID the Future from the vault, philosopher of science Paul Nelson concludes his talk with host Andrew McDiarmid on what it takes...

Listen

Episode 1090

January 29, 2018 00:25:42
Episode Cover

Mike Keas and Paul Nelson on the New Theistic Evolution Book and Common Descent

On the episode of ID the Future, historian of science Mike Keas interviews philosopher of biology Paul Nelson on his contribution to the important...

Listen