Who Should Define Intelligent Design, ID Theorists or Their Critics?

Episode 17 July 25, 2006 00:08:59
Who Should Define Intelligent Design, ID Theorists or Their Critics?
Intelligent Design the Future
Who Should Define Intelligent Design, ID Theorists or Their Critics?

Jul 25 2006 | 00:08:59

/

Show Notes

It is common that critics of intelligent design misrepresent the nature of intelligent design in order to make it sound unscientific, unconstitutional, and unpalatable to scientists and the public. In the Kitzmiller vs Dover court case last year, Judge Jones even adopted the critics’ false version of intelligent design rather than letting the proponents of ID stake out their own theory, and speak for themselves. This podcast looks at two recent misrepresentations in the media made by ID-critics involved on the legal side of this debate.

Other Episodes

Episode 1525

November 03, 2021 00:35:12
Episode Cover

New Book Spotlights High Tech Animal Navigation

Today’s ID the Future spotlights the new book Animal Algorithms: Evolution and the Mysterious Origin of Ingenious Instincts. The author, Eric Cassell, joins host...

Listen

Episode 146

July 06, 2007 00:10:19
Episode Cover

Debunking Dawkins: Discussing his Edge of EvolutionBook Review 

Today ID The Future examines Richard Dawkins' review of Michael Behe's new book, The Edge of Evolution. Broadcasting from Washington, D.C., CSC's Logan Gage...

Listen

Episode 2164

January 21, 2026 00:31:56
Episode Cover

Why Intelligence is Necessary to Explain Nature's Functional Information

We already have a well-established law that shows us how order can decrease in a physical system. But is there a law that explains...

Listen