Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3

Episode 288 • January 08, 2009 • 00:13:14
Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3
Intelligent Design the Future
Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3

Jan 08 2009 | 00:13:14

/

Show Notes

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin explains why any philosophical implications of intelligent design, or any religious motives, beliefs, and affiliations of ID proponents, do not disqualify ID from having scientific merit.

This podcast is taken from a series of articles published at OpposingViews.com and can be read here.

Other Episodes

Episode 1926

July 10, 2024 • 00:37:26
Episode Cover

Giving Up Darwin's Brilliant and Beautiful Theory

Five years ago, Yale University professor of computer science David Gelernter wrote that he was bidding farewell to neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory. Why would he...

Listen

Episode 188

November 30, 2007 • 00:05:12
Episode Cover

Darwinian Hiring Practices?

On this episode of ID The Future CSC's Dr. West explores how early 20th century Darwinists encouraged employee selection be based on natural selection....

Listen

Episode 1927

July 12, 2024 • 00:24:35
Episode Cover

William Dembski on Why Intelligent Design Matters

On this ID the Future from the archive, intelligent design pioneer William Dembski unpacks one of his chapters in The Comprehensive Guide to Science...

Listen