Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3

Episode 288 January 08, 2009 00:13:14
Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3
Intelligent Design the Future
Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3

Jan 08 2009 | 00:13:14

/

Show Notes

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin explains why any philosophical implications of intelligent design, or any religious motives, beliefs, and affiliations of ID proponents, do not disqualify ID from having scientific merit.

This podcast is taken from a series of articles published at OpposingViews.com and can be read here.

Other Episodes

Episode 669

August 14, 2013 00:20:33
Episode Cover

Bioethicist Wesley J. Smith Dissects the "Anti-Science" Label

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin talks with bioethicist Wesley J. Smith about a recent article he wrote at First Things....

Listen

Episode 1583

April 04, 2022 00:36:21
Episode Cover

Casey Luskin and Adam Shapiro Debate Intelligent Design, Pt. 1

On today’s ID the Future, design theorist Casey Luskin, an editor of The Comprehensive Guide to Science and Faith, and science historian Adam Shapiro,...

Listen

Episode 533

January 20, 2012 00:13:21
Episode Cover

Are Pre-Cambrian Fossils the Solution to Darwin's Dilemma?

On this episode of ID the Future, David Boze interviews Casey Luskin about a new study which determined that Precambrian microfossils could not have...

Listen