Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3

Episode 288 • January 08, 2009 • 00:13:14
Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3
Intelligent Design the Future
Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3

Jan 08 2009 | 00:13:14

/

Show Notes

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin explains why any philosophical implications of intelligent design, or any religious motives, beliefs, and affiliations of ID proponents, do not disqualify ID from having scientific merit.

This podcast is taken from a series of articles published at OpposingViews.com and can be read here.

Other Episodes

Episode 1451

May 07, 2021 • 00:15:45
Episode Cover

William Dembski on the Gilmore & Glahn Show, Pt. 4

On this ID the Future from the vault, hear the final segment of Bill Dembski’s appearance on the Gilmore & Glahn radio show. Dembski...

Listen

Episode 1811

October 11, 2023 • 00:20:18
Episode Cover

The Miracle of Man: Reflections on The Westminster Conference

Is mankind an error-prone accident of nature or a masterpiece of engineering and intention? On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid invites physicist...

Listen

Episode 0

September 26, 2011 • 00:07:49
Episode Cover

Deepening Darwin's Dilemma with Jonathan Wells

This episode of ID the Future features biologist and Discovery Institute Senior Fellow Jonathan Wells, who explains why Darwin saw the Cambrian explosion as...

Listen