Decade after Dover, Pt 2: Does ID Require a Supernatural Creator?

Episode 892 December 21, 2015 00:27:42
Decade after Dover, Pt 2: Does ID Require a Supernatural Creator?
Intelligent Design the Future
Decade after Dover, Pt 2: Does ID Require a Supernatural Creator?

Dec 21 2015 | 00:27:42

/

Show Notes

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin discusses the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial. Ten years ago, on December 20, 2005, Judge John E. Jones ruled in Kitzmiller v. Dover that intelligent design is religion and not science. His decision was based on faulty reasoning and misrepresentation of intelligent design. Listen to a recent lecture by Casey Luskin who covered the trial for Evolution News. Here in part two he discusses whether intelligent design requires a supernatural creator.

Other Episodes

Episode 0

November 14, 2018 00:22:52
Episode Cover

The Hypocritcal Bias Against Faith in Science Rhetoric

On this episode of ID The Future from the vault, Dr. John West, Associate Director for Discovery Institute’s Center for Science & Culture, discusses...

Listen

Episode 1268

November 08, 2019 00:09:37
Episode Cover

Stephen Meyer on Phillip Johnson’s Courage

On this episode of ID The Future, Stephen Meyer, director of Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture, honors Phillip Johnson, the U.C. Berkeley...

Listen

Episode 426

October 18, 2010 00:12:39
Episode Cover

Evolution Rarely the Basis of Research: Nature's "Evolutionary Gems" Just Narrative Gloss

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin continues his series responding to Nature's evolution evangelism packet, taking a look at truly interesting...

Listen