Decade after Dover, Pt 2: Does ID Require a Supernatural Creator?

Episode 892 December 21, 2015 00:27:42
Decade after Dover, Pt 2: Does ID Require a Supernatural Creator?
Intelligent Design the Future
Decade after Dover, Pt 2: Does ID Require a Supernatural Creator?

Dec 21 2015 | 00:27:42

/

Show Notes

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin discusses the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial. Ten years ago, on December 20, 2005, Judge John E. Jones ruled in Kitzmiller v. Dover that intelligent design is religion and not science. His decision was based on faulty reasoning and misrepresentation of intelligent design. Listen to a recent lecture by Casey Luskin who covered the trial for Evolution News. Here in part two he discusses whether intelligent design requires a supernatural creator.

Other Episodes

Episode 1510

September 29, 2021 00:27:44
Episode Cover

Bidding Adieu to Steven Weinberg’s Take on Science and Faith

On today’s ID the Future, Casey Luskin, associate director of Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture, discusses his Evolution News article about the...

Listen

Episode 2159

January 10, 2026 00:25:04
Episode Cover

Sex: A Spicy Problem for Evolutionary Theory

Sexual reproduction ought to be a recipe for evolutionary disaster. It's a waste of resources producing no short-term advantages. It demands an entirely different...

Listen

Episode 0

September 14, 2011 00:17:02
Episode Cover

Darwinian Economics: Capitalism or Marxism?

Does Darwinism lend support more naturally to a capitalist moral-economic perspective or to a Marxist one? On this episode of ID the Future, David...

Listen