Confronting Misrepresentative and Deceptive Definitions of ID

Intelligent Design the Future

Oct 29 2007 | 00:08:59

00:00 / 00:08:59

Show Notes

On this episode of IDTF CSC’s Casey Luskin looks at common misrepresentations of intelligent design in the political and legal arenas. Comparing the comments from critics to the actual writings of ID proponents it is clear that critics are knowingly misrepresenting intelligent design in order to attack the theory.

Other Episodes

Episode 1715

February 24, 2023 • 00:17:03

Cambridge UP Book Airbrushes Darwin’s Contribution to Scientific Racism

On today’s ID the Future historian Richard Weikart (Cal State Stanislaus) dissects a recent Cambridge University Press book on social Darwinism by Jeffrey O’Connell...

Episode 1484

July 28, 2021 • 00:39:33

ID Pioneer Michael Behe Tangles with Two Philosophers, Pt. 2

In today’s ID the Future, intelligent design pioneer Michael Behe continues his conversation with philosophers Pat Flynn and Jim Madden. Here in Part 2...

Episode 3

May 24, 2006 • 00:07:09

Tiktaalik Fossil Find No Threat To Intelligent Design

"This latest fossil find poses no threat to intelligent design.” So says Discovery Institute's Casey Luskin. In this short interview about recent fossil finds...