On this episode of ID The Future, CSC's Casey Luskin discusses with senior fellow David DeWolf the current issue of the Montana Law Review which features a lively exchange of views about the Kitzmiller v. Dover intelligent design decision. The Kitzmiller decision isn't wearing well even among legal scholars who are critical of intelligent design, and Irons' article does little to seriously defend Judge Jones' ruling.
The lead article on the Dover decision ("Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover") was co-authored by David DeWolf, John West, and Casey Luskin. A second article by Peter Irons ("Disaster in Dover") responds to the first article, followed by a short rebuttal by DeWolf, West, and Luskin.
More biologists are returning to the use of design-based assumptions, tools, models, and language to study the natural world. Dr. Brian Miller explains why...
On this ID the Future from the vault, biologist Ann Gauger discuss panspermia, the topic of a peer-reviewed paper published recently by several very...
On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin talks with Dr. Cornelius Hunter — a Discovery Institute Fellow, adjunct professor, and author —...