Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Episode 558 April 09, 2012 00:16:50
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?
Intelligent Design the Future
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Apr 09 2012 | 00:16:50

/

Show Notes

Is the only good science peer-reviewed science? Are there other avenues to present important scientific work? On this episode of ID The Future, Professor of Mathematics Dr. Frank Tipler discusses the pros and cons of peer review and refereed journals. More than fifty peer-reviewed papers discussing intelligent design have been published, but critics of the theory still proclaim a lack of peer-reviewed work as an argument. Listen in as Tipler shows how things have changed with the peer review process and what we can do about it.

Other Episodes

Episode 0

July 28, 2014 00:05:16
Episode Cover

Pro-ID Paper Examines Irreducible Complexity of Birds in Flight

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin reports on a new peer-reviewed paper arguing for the irreducible complexity of two systems vital...

Listen

Episode 1924

July 05, 2024 00:18:01
Episode Cover

Stephen Meyer Visits the Multiverse of Madness

On today’s ID the Future out of the vault, radio host Michael Medved sits down with bestselling science author Stephen Meyer to discuss the...

Listen

Episode 1068

November 13, 2017 00:11:17
Episode Cover

Why Information is the Basis of the Universe

On this episode of ID The Future, Sarah Chaffee talks with physicist Dr. Brian Miller about a recent article that argues that the fundamental...

Listen