Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Episode 558 April 09, 2012 00:16:50
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?
Intelligent Design the Future
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Apr 09 2012 | 00:16:50

/

Show Notes

Is the only good science peer-reviewed science? Are there other avenues to present important scientific work? On this episode of ID The Future, Professor of Mathematics Dr. Frank Tipler discusses the pros and cons of peer review and refereed journals. More than fifty peer-reviewed papers discussing intelligent design have been published, but critics of the theory still proclaim a lack of peer-reviewed work as an argument. Listen in as Tipler shows how things have changed with the peer review process and what we can do about it.

Other Episodes

Episode 1712

February 17, 2023 00:10:29
Episode Cover

The Venus Flytrap Takes a Bite Out of Darwinism

On this ID the Future from the vault, Andrew McDiarmid reads from Marcos Eberlin’s fascinating book Foresight: How the Chemistry of Life Reveals Planning...

Listen

Episode 1291

February 03, 2020 00:12:38
Episode Cover

Protein Scientist Douglas Axe at the Dallas Area Science and Faith Conference

On this episode of ID the Future, guest host Jonathan Witt sits down with molecular biologist Douglas Axe at the recent Dallas Science and...

Listen

Episode 1408

January 27, 2021 00:25:04
Episode Cover

Casey Luskin Returns, Teases a New Book, Celebrates ID 3.0

On today’s ID the Future, Rob Crowther continues his conversation with Casey Luskin, the intelligent design proponent who previously worked for Discovery Institute’s Center...

Listen