Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Episode 558 April 09, 2012 00:16:50
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?
Intelligent Design the Future
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Apr 09 2012 | 00:16:50

/

Show Notes

Is the only good science peer-reviewed science? Are there other avenues to present important scientific work? On this episode of ID The Future, Professor of Mathematics Dr. Frank Tipler discusses the pros and cons of peer review and refereed journals. More than fifty peer-reviewed papers discussing intelligent design have been published, but critics of the theory still proclaim a lack of peer-reviewed work as an argument. Listen in as Tipler shows how things have changed with the peer review process and what we can do about it.

Other Episodes

Episode 1603

May 23, 2022 00:16:47
Episode Cover

Distinguished Glasgow Surgeon David Galloway Dissects Darwinism

Today’s ID the Future brings onto the show Scottish physician David Galloway, author of the recent book Design Dissected and former president of Royal...

Listen

Episode 341

September 16, 2009 00:13:53
Episode Cover

Scientific Journals Haunted by Intelligent Design: Michael Behe on Irreducible Complexity and PNAS

On this episode of ID the Future Anika Smith interviews Lehigh University professor Michael Behe about irreducible complexity and the way his critics have...

Listen

Episode 0

July 01, 2015 00:13:15
Episode Cover

Serendipity and Exaptation: Circular Arguments for Darwinian Evolution

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin and guest Dr. Cornelius Hunter talk about the issue of serendipity and what it means...

Listen