Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Episode 558 April 09, 2012 00:16:50
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?
Intelligent Design the Future
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Apr 09 2012 | 00:16:50

/

Show Notes

Is the only good science peer-reviewed science? Are there other avenues to present important scientific work? On this episode of ID The Future, Professor of Mathematics Dr. Frank Tipler discusses the pros and cons of peer review and refereed journals. More than fifty peer-reviewed papers discussing intelligent design have been published, but critics of the theory still proclaim a lack of peer-reviewed work as an argument. Listen in as Tipler shows how things have changed with the peer review process and what we can do about it.

Other Episodes

Episode 0

November 13, 2013 00:35:47
Episode Cover

Defending Critical Analysis in Cross-Examination: Dr. Stephen Meyer Answers Questions in Texas

This episode of ID the Future features Dr. Stephen Meyer responding to his critics during a questioning period before the Texas State Board of...

Listen

Episode 230

June 02, 2008 00:06:44
Episode Cover

Testifying Against Academic Freedom in Louisiana

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin continues his review of the recent academic freedom bill hearings in Louisiana. Of particular interest...

Listen

Episode 0

April 08, 2013 00:09:58
Episode Cover

When It's Wise to Question the Scientific Consensus

On this episode of ID the Future, Anika Smith interviews CSC Senior Fellow Jay Richards about when it's wise to doubt a "scientific consensus."...

Listen