Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Episode 558 • April 09, 2012 • 00:16:50
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?
Intelligent Design the Future
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Apr 09 2012 | 00:16:50

/

Show Notes

Is the only good science peer-reviewed science? Are there other avenues to present important scientific work? On this episode of ID The Future, Professor of Mathematics Dr. Frank Tipler discusses the pros and cons of peer review and refereed journals. More than fifty peer-reviewed papers discussing intelligent design have been published, but critics of the theory still proclaim a lack of peer-reviewed work as an argument. Listen in as Tipler shows how things have changed with the peer review process and what we can do about it.

Other Episodes

Episode 0

June 07, 2010 • 00:19:30
Episode Cover

Darwin Doubting in the UK: Columnist, Doctor and Author James Le Fanu

This episode of ID the Future features part one of Casey Luskin's interview with James Le Fanu, author of Why Us?: How Science Rediscovered...

Listen

Episode 317

June 10, 2009 • 00:16:49
Episode Cover

Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity, Part One

On this episode of ID the Future Casey Luskin interviews Rich Akin from Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity, who shares why he founded...

Listen

Episode 1512

October 04, 2021 • 00:17:52
Episode Cover

Biologist Jonathan Wells Offers a Cure for Zombie Science

On this ID the Future, Zombie Science author and biologist Jonathan Wells and host Andrew McDiarmid explore the seductive but misleading appeal to consensus...

Listen