Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Episode 558 • April 09, 2012 • 00:16:50
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?
Intelligent Design the Future
Peer-Review: Ensuring Quality or Enforcing Orthodoxy?

Apr 09 2012 | 00:16:50

/

Show Notes

Is the only good science peer-reviewed science? Are there other avenues to present important scientific work? On this episode of ID The Future, Professor of Mathematics Dr. Frank Tipler discusses the pros and cons of peer review and refereed journals. More than fifty peer-reviewed papers discussing intelligent design have been published, but critics of the theory still proclaim a lack of peer-reviewed work as an argument. Listen in as Tipler shows how things have changed with the peer review process and what we can do about it.

Other Episodes

Episode 0

December 02, 2016 • 00:13:13
Episode Cover

Jay Richards on Why Intelligent Design Isn’t Bad Theology

Jay Richards, a Senior Fellow of Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture, draws on his expertise in theology and intelligent design to refute...

Listen

Episode 0

December 21, 2018 • 00:15:30
Episode Cover

C.S. Lewis & Science: An Interview With Dr. John West, Part 3

On this episode of ID the Future from the vault, David Boze talks about the book The Magician's Twin: C. S. Lewis on Science,...

Listen

Episode 528

January 09, 2012 • 00:23:42
Episode Cover

Law Professor David DeWolf on the History of the Santorum Amendment

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Discovery Institute Senior Fellow David DeWolf, a law professor at Gonzaga University School of...

Listen