On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin exposes how evidence given for macroevolution in The Language of Science and Faith is too weak to hold any weight. In their book, Francis Collins and Karl Giberson make the all-too-common claim that macroevolution is merely microevolution over a prolonged period of time. Are the proposed mechanisms really as simple as they sound? Luskin discusses the insufficiency of Collins and Gibersons' argument in Part 5 of his continued review of The Language of Science and Faith.
On this episode of ID the Future, Rob Crowther continues his conversation with J. Scott Turner, biologist at the State University of New York...
On this episode of ID the Future, hear about a few cases of scientism acting as a quasi-religion. For many people, science — and...
On this episode of ID the Future, host Robert Crowther speaks with Discovery Institute Senior Fellow Jay Richards, a speaker at last weekend’s Dallas...