On this episode of ID The Future CSC's Robert Crowther examines whether intelligent design is an impediment to scientific progress, and says the answer is an emphatic no.
According to Crowther, Darwinists making this claim are mistaken. Such as a recent Sky & Telescope blog post that stated: "Intelligent design basically tells us to stop investigating the natural world, because when we hit a brick wall in our knowledge, we can find the answers in god. …" and "… Intelligent design, on the other hand, stifles our perseverance because it says that answers to the great questions have already been handed to us on a silver platter." Listen in to find out why this just isn't so.
In today’s ID the Future historian Richard Weikart (Cal State Stanislaus) dissects a new Cambridge University Press book on social Darwinism by Jeffrey O’Connell...
On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin discusses how theistic Darwinian evolutionists Francis Collins and Karl Giberson rely on the argument that...
On this episode of ID the Future Anika Smith interviews Lehigh University professor Michael Behe about irreducible complexity and the way his critics have...