Intelligent Design Doesn't Go There: Opposing Views, Part 4

Episode 289 • January 12, 2009 • 00:32:40
Intelligent Design Doesn't Go There: Opposing Views, Part 4
Intelligent Design the Future
Intelligent Design Doesn't Go There: Opposing Views, Part 4

Jan 12 2009 | 00:32:40

/

Show Notes

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin makes the case that intelligent design has scientific merit because it is does not try to address religious questions about the supernatural. ID limits its claims to what can be scientifically inferred from the empirical domain, setting it apart from creationism. Listen in as Luskin shows how ID is a legitimate scientific alternative to neo-Darwinism that has key differences from creationism.

This podcast is taken from a series of articles published at OpposingViews.com and can be read here.

Other Episodes

Episode 644

May 17, 2013 • 00:38:13
Episode Cover

The Michael Medved Show Weekly Science & Culture Update: Featuring Steve Meyer and John Lennox

On this episode of ID the Future, Stephen Meyer and Oxford professor John Lennox discuss human exceptionalism and the deeper significance of the Gosnell...

Listen

Episode 0

October 17, 2007 • 00:10:37
Episode Cover

Was Justice Denied to FTE during the Dover Intelligent Design Trial?

On this episode of ID The Future we’re featuring an interview by CSC public policy officer Casey Luskin with Seth Cooper (himself an attorney...

Listen

Episode 2009

January 25, 2025 • 00:55:52
Episode Cover

Mama Bear Apologetics Takes on Atheist Richard Dawkins

Today’s ID the Future out of vault puts atheist Richard Dawkins’s book Outgrowing God under the microscope and reveals multiple ways his argument smashes...

Listen