In today's episode of ID The Future, CSC legal intern Guillermo Dekat reviews Cornelius G. Hunter's new book Science's Blind Spot. In law, Dekat explains, people harmed by a product are entitled to damages if they can prove the product is defective. If dogmatic science is a product under investigation, he continues, then Hunter's work in Blind Spot proves its defects. Dekat charts Hunter's arguments about science's "theological naturalism," and provides an overview of the other points made by the author.
Is it possible to integrate the evidence for intelligent design into full-length high school biology and chemistry courses? Of course! Are such courses currently...
On this episode of ID The Future, Discovery Institute senior fellows David Berlinski and Michael Denton, both long-time critics of neo-Darwinism, discuss their primary...
Today’s episode of ID the Future comes from a Berkeley, California symposium honoring the recently deceased Phillip Johnson. Biologist Jonathan Wells recalls how he...